Sherlocked · Report
OSINT

Review of Lease Readiness Claims for Phase 3 Expansion

Case 16/07/26Posts 99Videos 42Total 141

Assessment

Overview

Carrie-Anne Ridsdale (Carrie), who presents publicly as Jayne Price repeatedly announced plans for a 'Phase 3' expansion in Pontypool, claiming landlord agreement and lease readiness, but the timeline shows shifting explanations and unclear substantiation of actual control or use.

In early 2023, Carrie began referencing the division of her shops into phases, specifically mentioning Blackwood and Pontypool as Phase 1 and Phase 2. By autumn 2024, she was actively promoting the opening and operation of Pontypool Phase 1 and Phase 2, with frequent updates about donations, volunteers, and shop logistics. This period is marked by a flurry of posts and videos detailing the physical connection between the two phases, ongoing renovations, and the acceptance of donations, painting a picture of rapid expansion and operational activity.

By mid-2025, the narrative shifted towards a new ambition: the creation of a 'Phase 3' in Pontypool. Carrie publicly inquired about signing a lease for Phase 3, claimed to have received a significant price reduction from the landlord, and described ongoing negotiations and preparations. She repeatedly asserted that agreements had been reached with her current landlord (Nasrat Shoaib, as established in the identity links) for this new space, and at times stated that she and her team had already moved items into Phase 3, even though the lease had not yet been signed. However, she also described the space as damp and in need of work, and at one point indicated that Phase 3 was initially intended to be a basement area, but this was not viable, so alternative uses such as storage and sorting were considered instead.

Throughout late 2025 and into 2026, Carrie continued to reference Phase 3 as pending or in progress, with updates about waiting for work to be completed, needing additional warehouse space, and having permission to use all areas of P1, P2, and P3. She claimed to have a lease for Phase 3 by June 2026, but earlier statements from the same period indicated that the lease had not yet been signed and that access or use was contingent on further developments. Carrie-Anne Ridsdale also described logistical challenges, such as moving large quantities of donations between phases and dealing with landlord-imposed restrictions on collection times.

The evidence shows a pattern of escalating claims about Phase 3, from initial landlord discussions and lease negotiations to assertions of occupancy and operational readiness. However, these claims are often contradicted by subsequent statements about delays, incomplete agreements, and shifting purposes for the space. Carrie's public communications frequently present the expansion as imminent or already underway, while private or later admissions reveal ongoing obstacles and a lack of concrete progress. There is no clear, independently verifiable documentation of a signed lease or sustained operational use of a distinct Phase 3 premises, despite repeated announcements to that effect.

In summary, Carrie's narrative around Phase 3 in Pontypool is characterised by ambitious public claims, inconsistent explanations, and a lack of substantiating detail. The shifting storylines and absence of clear evidence for actual control or use of a Phase 3 space undermine the credibility of the expansion narrative. This pattern is significant because it affects donor and volunteer perceptions, operational transparency, and the trustworthiness of further fundraising or partnership appeals related to the supposed new phase.

Sherlocked

Post analysis

The legal position of a commercial tenant who remains in occupation of retail premises after the expiry of a fixed-term lease in England and Wales, particularly where the lease expressly excludes the security of tenure provisions under sections 24 to 28 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, is quite clear but nuanced. Given the lease at 5 Crane Street, Pontypool, ran from 17 January 2023 to 16 January 2026, with the contracting-out procedure validly executed and acknowledged by the tenant, the tenant’s right to remain after expiry is effectively terminated. The tenant does not benefit from the statutory protection that would otherwise allow them to remain or renew the lease.

Once the lease expires, the tenant’s occupation without the landlord’s consent is unlawful. The tenant becomes a trespasser or holdover tenant, depending on the circumstances. The landlord is entitled to regain possession and can seek legal remedies to do so. However, the situation is complicated by the tenant’s alleged continued occupation, including sleeping or residing on the premises, and refusal to allow landlord access.

Regarding the tenant’s legal status after expiry, continued occupation alone does not automatically create a new tenancy. However, certain conduct by either party can inadvertently create a new tenancy or licence. For example, if the landlord accepts rent or any payment after expiry, this may imply a periodic tenancy (often monthly or quarterly depending on payment frequency). Even without rent, if the landlord permits occupation or grants access, a tenancy at will or a licence could arise. Therefore, the landlord must be careful to avoid any conduct that might be construed as consent to continued occupation or a new tenancy arrangement.

The dossier’s narrative about “Phase 3” at Pontypool reveals a pattern of ambiguous and inconsistent claims by Carrie regarding lease status and occupancy. Carrie-Anne Ridsdale has repeatedly claimed to have landlord approval, a signed lease, or operational control of Phase 3, but these claims are contradicted by admissions of unsigned leases, ongoing negotiations, and landlord disputes. This inconsistency undermines the credibility of any assertion that Carrie has lawful possession or tenancy rights beyond the original lease term. It also suggests that any continued occupation after 16 January 2026 is likely without legal basis.

From a regulatory and practical standpoint, using premises leased and authorised for retail purposes as accommodation or for sleeping raises significant issues. Commercial leases typically restrict use to specified purposes; residential use or sleeping on the premises would likely breach the lease terms and planning permissions. This misuse could trigger enforcement action from local planning authorities for change of use, fire safety violations if the premises are not equipped or certified for habitation, insurance complications (as commercial policies often exclude residential risks), and liability for business rates or council tax if the use changes. The landlord and tenant could both face penalties or increased costs. The dossier’s mention of Carrie allegedly residing or sleeping on the premises after lease expiry heightens these concerns and may expose the landlord to reputational and legal risks if not addressed promptly.

Regarding access, the lease requires the tenant to provide access on seven days’ written notice except in emergencies. The tenant’s refusal or obstruction of access after lease expiry is unlawful. However, the fact that the tenant is apparently living or sleeping inside complicates the landlord’s options. Unlike residential tenancies, commercial leases do not confer the same protections against eviction, but forcibly removing a person who is physically present may expose the landlord to civil claims for unlawful eviction or even criminal liability under laws protecting against harassment or forcible entry, especially if the tenant is considered a trespasser but is physically present. Peaceful re-entry or changing locks without a court order is risky if the tenant is inside, as it may be construed as an illegal eviction or harassment. The safest and legally correct approach is to seek a possession order through the courts.

The landlord should commence possession proceedings promptly, relying on the lease expiry and contracting-out of security of tenure to argue for possession. Once a possession order is obtained, bailiffs can enforce it to remove the tenant and recover vacant possession lawfully. This process minimises the risk of unlawful eviction claims or criminal liability.

After possession is recovered, the landlord must deal lawfully with any goods left behind. Under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 and common law, the landlord cannot simply dispose of or sell the tenant’s belongings without following proper procedures. The landlord should serve a notice to the former tenant specifying the goods found, their storage arrangements, and a reasonable period to collect them. If uncollected, the landlord may sell or dispose of the goods but must act reasonably and document the process to avoid claims for conversion or trespass.

In summary, the landlord’s practical steps to recover 5 Crane Street lawfully and swiftly are: first, avoid accepting any rent or payments that might imply consent to continued occupation; second, serve a formal written notice demanding possession and access, referencing the lease expiry and contracting-out; third, if access is refused, initiate possession proceedings in the county court; fourth, obtain a possession order and enforce it with bailiffs; fifth, once possession is regained, serve notices regarding any goods left behind and handle them according to legal requirements; and finally, ensure compliance with planning, fire safety, insurance, and business rates regulations, particularly addressing any unauthorised residential use.

The dossier’s evidence of inconsistent claims about Phase 3 occupancy and lease status supports the conclusion that Carrie’s continued occupation after 16 January 2026 is without legal foundation, reinforcing the landlord’s right to possession and the need to follow proper legal procedures to regain control and mitigate risks.

Timeline

Chronology

  • 23/10/24

    Lease signing for a new phase in Pontypool is announced as imminent.

    Thursday is lease signing day. We get the keys.source video
  • 14/05/25

    Operator publicly floats the idea of signing a lease for Pontypool Phase 3.

    PONTYPOOL PHASE 3.... SHALL WE SIGN A LEASE ?!source post
  • 15/05/25

    Operator claims landlord approval and a significant price reduction for Phase 3.

    Pontypool phase three. We've had the go-ahead. Off a landlord and they have negotiated a very good price for us.source video
  • 13/06/25

    Operator states that starting Phase 3 is delayed due to P2 being full of donations.

    they can't get into P2 yet. It's full of donations because we're waiting to start Phase 3 of Pontypool.source video
  • 28/06/25

    Operator claims to have moved into Phase 3 without signing the lease.

  • 15/02/26

    Operator states that P2 landlords own P3 and expansion is being considered.

    we've spoke to landlords, P2 landlords this week about P3, because P2 landlords own P3.source video
  • 08/06/26

    Operator claims permission to use all areas of P1, P2, and P3.

    Also cited in Inaccuracy 4

  • 13/06/26

    Operator asserts that a lease for Phase 3 is already held.

Phase 3 lease status and occupancy

Subject vs subject

high

Carrie-Anne Ridsdale claimed in mid-2025 that she had moved into Phase 3 without having signed the lease, but a year later asserted that she already had a lease for it. This reversal highlights inconsistency in her statements about legal control and occupancy of the premises.

Claim
Me and Sammy's already moved into P3. We haven't signed for it yet and we've started moving stuff in.28/06/25 · source video
Against
I already have a lease for it.13/06/26 · source post

Why this matters Donors and volunteers may be misled about the legitimacy and security of the operation's expansion if lease status is misrepresented.

Also cited in Inaccuracy 2, Timeline 7, Inaccuracy 1, Timeline 10

Phase 3 landlord agreement and readiness

Subject vs subject

high

On one day, Carrie stated that a price had been agreed with the landlord for Phase 3, but the next day described the landlord as 'delusional', suggesting unresolved conflict or lack of agreement. This undermines the certainty of the claimed arrangement.

Claim
we are current, well we've already discussed it and agreed on a price with one of my current landlords for phase three of Pontypool.25/06/25 · source video
Against
The landlord messaged me last night and was... I tell you why. I think they're delusional, to be honest.26/06/25 · source video

Why this matters Conflicting statements about landlord relations cast doubt on the reliability of operational updates and the feasibility of the expansion.

Also cited in Inaccuracy 3

Phase 3 lease readiness and funding

Subject vs subject

high

In the same undated source, Carrie first claims that P3 is available and only requires signing the lease, then immediately states that the lease has not been signed due to pending funding. This internal contradiction highlights uncertainty about the actual status of the expansion.

Claim
We've got P3. If we want it, we've only got to sign the lease for it.source video
Against
I just haven't signed the lease because I'm waiting on funding to come through from different sources.source video

Why this matters Ambiguity about lease status and funding may affect donor confidence and the credibility of appeals for support.

Also cited in Inaccuracy 6

Inaccuracy check

Medium severity

medium

Claimed lease for Phase 3 without substantiation

Carrie asserts holding a lease for Phase 3, but earlier and contemporaneous statements describe the lease as unsigned or pending funding, and no independent documentation of a signed lease is provided in the corpus. A genuine lease would typically be evidenced by a dated, signed agreement or third-party confirmation, which is absent here.

Why this matters Misrepresenting lease status can mislead donors and volunteers about the operation's legitimacy and stability.

Also cited in Contradiction 1, Timeline 10

Inaccuracy check

Medium severity

medium

Claimed operational readiness of Phase 3

Carrie-Anne Ridsdale claims to have moved into Phase 3 and begun operations without a signed lease, which raises questions about the legitimacy and security of the occupancy. Operating in a premises without a formal agreement exposes the organisation and its stakeholders to legal and financial risks.

Why this matters Operating without a lease can result in eviction, loss of donations, and reputational harm.

Also cited in Contradiction 1, Timeline 7

Inaccuracy check

Medium severity

medium

Claimed landlord agreement for Phase 3

Carrie claims to have agreed on a price with the landlord for Phase 3, but the following day describes the landlord as 'delusional', suggesting that no firm agreement was in place. This inconsistency undermines the credibility of the claimed arrangement.

Why this matters False claims of landlord agreement can mislead supporters and complicate future negotiations.

Also cited in Contradiction 2

Inaccuracy check

Medium severity

medium

Claimed permission to use all areas of P1, P2, and P3

We have permission to use all areas of p1, p2 and p3.08/06/26 · source post

Carrie asserts having permission to use all areas of the three phases, but earlier statements indicate ongoing negotiations, unsigned leases, and landlord disputes. No independent verification of such broad permission is provided.

Why this matters Overstating permissions may encourage risky operational decisions and mislead stakeholders.

Also cited in Timeline 9

Inaccuracy check

Low severity

low

Claimed Phase 3 as pending with volunteers assigned

Pontypool (x2 managers to alternate - possibly 3- PHASE 3 PENDING) up to 5 - 6 volunteers per day in different areas.15/02/26 · source post

Carrie references Phase 3 as pending and assigns volunteers, but the lack of a signed lease or clear operational plan makes this claim premature and potentially misleading.

Why this matters Prematurely assigning volunteers to an unconfirmed site can waste resources and erode trust.

Inaccuracy check

Medium severity

medium

Claimed P3 is available and only requires lease signing

Carrie-Anne Ridsdale claims P3 is secured and only needs a lease signature, but immediately admits the lease is unsigned due to funding. This contradiction highlights uncertainty about the actual status of the expansion.

Why this matters Unclear status may affect donor confidence and operational planning.

Also cited in Contradiction 3

Escalating specificity and shifting explanations

Moderate pattern

Carrie's narrative about Phase 3 evolves from vague intentions and landlord discussions to increasingly specific claims of lease readiness, occupancy, and operational use. However, these claims are repeatedly walked back or contradicted by subsequent admissions of delays, funding issues, or unresolved landlord negotiations. This pattern is evident across posts and videos from mid-2025 through mid-2026, with Carrie oscillating between presenting Phase 3 as imminent, pending, or already in use, and then revealing obstacles or incomplete agreements.

Authority borrowing and landlord referencing

Weak pattern

Throughout the expansion narrative, Carrie repeatedly invokes the authority of her landlords (notably Nasrat Shoaib, as established in the identity links) to lend legitimacy to her claims about Phase 3. She alternates between describing positive negotiations and landlord approval, and expressing frustration or conflict with the same landlords. This borrowing of authority is used to reassure followers and potential donors of the operation's legitimacy, even when the underlying agreements are unclear or disputed.

Regulatory

Medium priority

Carrie-Anne Ridsdale's repeated public claims of lease readiness, landlord agreement, and operational control over Phase 3 without substantiating documentation expose the operation to regulatory scrutiny for misrepresentation. Such claims may mislead donors, volunteers, and local authorities about the legitimacy and stability of the expansion, and could result in legal or financial consequences if the premises are used without proper agreements.

Basis: Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 · Report to: Trading Standards Enforcement / Environmental Health

Claim ledger

Verdict tally

20 unsupported
Unsupported 20
Carrie announces that Pontypool phase 1 will be open from approximately 9am.
unsupported
Carrie mentioned that the Blackwood and Pontypool shops are currently designated as Phase 1 and Phase 2.
unsupported
Carrie is looking for three straight stairlifts for Pontypool for phase 1 and 2.
unsupported
Carrie-Anne Ridsdale references Pontypool Phase 2.
unsupported
Carrie states that there is no access upstairs or downstairs due to storing equipment for Pontypool Phase 2.
unsupported
Carrie states they will be in Pontypool the next day to initiate phase 2 and welcomes donations.
unsupported
All items are being sold at 50% off the marked price.
unsupported
Deliveries are being made to continue work on phase 2.
unsupported
Pontypool phase 2 will be open until 9 PM tonight.
unsupported
Donations will be taken at Pontypool phase 2 on 2024-11-03, and volunteers are welcome.
unsupported
Pontypool phase 2 will be open for sales and donations all day on 2024-11-03.
unsupported
Carrie states that furniture can be taken at Pontypool phase 2, noting that parking is easier during the day.
unsupported
Carrie-Anne Ridsdale identifies the location as Pontypool Phase 2.
unsupported
Carrie thanks Chloe and Dan for their work in Pontypool phase 2.
unsupported
Carrie claims that a secret experiment related to Pontypool phase 2 has been exposed.
unsupported
Carrie states that Pontypool phase 1 and 2 are open for late night shopping.
unsupported
Carrie-Anne Ridsdale announces that Pontypool phase 1 is open until 6pm and will also be open on Sunday.
unsupported
Carrie is requesting straight clothes rails and hangers for upstairs in Pontypool phase 2.
unsupported
Carrie announces that the Pontypool shop is open for late night shopping while decorating, with the main entrance in phase 2.
unsupported
Carrie states they will be in Pontypool until at least 8pm, referencing phase 1.
unsupported

Sources

Evidence base

141 sources collected and analysed (97 posts, 42 videos, 2 articles). 14 sources are cited in this dossier. Every cited claim links to its source inline. Corpus quotes are reproduced verbatim.

Related dossiers

All dossiers →