Overview
Carrie-Anne Ridsdale (Carrie), who presents publicly as Jayne Price claims authorities entered her premises without a warrant and that her electricity remains on, but evidence shows a warrant was used to disconnect power at one site.
Carrie, Carrie-Anne Ridsdale, publicly known as Jayne Price, has made multiple claims regarding the presence and actions of authorities at her business premises in Pontypool. Early in 2025, she asserted that Pontypool authorities should conduct an immediate investigation, claiming innocence and referencing a council grant. Over time, she advised others to demand warrants and legal representation before signing any documents, reflecting a consistent concern about legal authority and rights. In early 2026, she stated that trading standards and environmental law officials could enter businesses without warrants, though she acknowledged police could obtain warrants if access was refused.
In April and June 2026, Carrie claimed that CCTV footage was voluntarily provided to police without the need for a warrant, emphasising transparency and cooperation. However, on June 19, 2026, multiple sources, including a detailed article, reported that SSE personnel arrived at her Commercial Street premises with a warrant to conduct a meter check and disconnect electricity. Carrie contradicted this by stating that authorities did not need a warrant to enter and that her electricity remained on. She also claimed no forced entry occurred and that no electricity was cut. The following day, she alleged that bailiffs and a locksmith forcibly entered and turned off her electricity with a warrant.
Later statements in August 2026 clarified that the warrant was related to the Commercial Street premises and concerned discount deals, not the Crane Street location. Carrie-Anne Ridsdale asserted that the council task force would require a warrant and police officer to enter the property but suggested they could simply contact her for access instead. She also referenced accusations of bailiffs, clarifying that SSE with a warrant was involved.
The evidence shows a complex and evolving narrative from Carrie, with some claims directly contradicted by documented events and third-party reports. The presence of a warrant for electricity disconnection at Commercial Street is supported by multiple sources, while Carrie's claims of no warrant or electricity disconnection at that site are contradicted. Carrie's framing of voluntary cooperation with authorities contrasts with reports of forced entry and disconnection.
Overall, Carrie-Anne Ridsdale's accounts on the warrant and electricity disconnection issue are inconsistent and sometimes contradicted by external evidence. This discrepancy affects the credibility of her claims about legal authority and operational transparency. The case highlights tensions between Carrie's narrative and documented enforcement actions at her premises.

