Overview
Carrie-Anne Ridsdale (Carrie), who presents publicly as Jayne Price has repeatedly claimed favourable rental terms and no eviction notices, yet multiple premises have been repossessed or evicted, with landlords disputing these claims and legal actions underway.
From early 2023, Carrie frequently discussed challenges with high rents in Caerphilly and surrounding areas, emphasising the need for landlords to reduce prices to retain tenants. She reported negotiations resulting in rent reductions, sometimes citing specific figures such as £150, £200, or £300 monthly decreases. These claims were consistent with her narrative of struggling to secure affordable premises for her operations. By mid-2023, she expressed gratitude towards landlords who offered discounts or free rent periods, while also highlighting ongoing issues with property maintenance, such as leaking roofs and unfulfilled promises for repairs or improvements. She also mentioned negotiating lease terms, including longer leases and notice periods, and expressed frustration with landlords who failed to meet their obligations or who imposed unexpected charges like a 'window tax'.
Throughout late 2023 and into 2024, Carrie continued to assert that she was a good tenant, capable of paying rent within her means, and that landlords were sometimes unreasonable in their demands. She indicated plans to move premises due to dissatisfaction with current landlords or locations, often citing poor conditions or lack of support. She also claimed to have communicated clearly with landlords about her needs and to have received offers for new shops or extensions on leases. However, she simultaneously accused some landlords of neglect or harassment, including refusing to fix essential repairs and attempting to evict her prematurely.
In 2025, Carrie's narrative escalated to include allegations of bullying and coercion by landlords and their associates, claims of verbal and legal disputes, and assertions that she had not been evicted despite landlords' attempts. She admitted to relying on verbal agreements but expressed a preference for written contracts going forward. She also described instances where landlords changed locks or restricted access, which she contested as illegal or unjustified. Carrie-Anne Ridsdale claimed to have engaged legal and police support to address these disputes. She also mentioned receiving compensation or winning cases against landlords, though details were sparse.
By late 2025 and early 2026, Carrie reported multiple premises facing eviction or repossession, including the Caerphilly and Risca shops. She denied receiving formal eviction notices and insisted that any removal of goods by landlords was unlawful. She claimed ongoing negotiations with landlords regarding repairs and rent adjustments, often stating that landlords expected her to pay for necessary work. She also highlighted serious issues such as fire safety prohibition notices and utility disconnections affecting her operations. Despite these challenges, she maintained that landlords were aware of her presence and that she had signed or re-signed leases for some premises.
In mid-2026, Carrie's position became more defensive, denying eviction notices and accusing landlords of negligence and illegal actions, including changing locks and disposing of property without proper notice. She asserted that legal processes were being followed on her side, including police involvement and court cases. She also claimed to have authorization to access certain premises and emphasized her status as a registered community interest company, though this status does not confer tenancy rights. Carrie's statements about landlords ranged from cooperative to hostile, reflecting a complex and contentious relationship.
Overall, Carrie-Anne Ridsdale's claims about rental agreements, landlord cooperation, and eviction status are contradicted by documented evictions, repossessions, and legal actions. While she portrays herself as a responsible tenant facing unreasonable landlords, evidence shows multiple premises have been lost due to non-payment or disputes. Her insistence on not having received eviction notices conflicts with landlords' actions and court records. Carrie's narrative includes admissions of verbal agreements and disputes over lease terms, but also accusations of landlord misconduct and illegal eviction practices.
This pattern reveals a protracted and escalating conflict between Carrie and multiple landlords, characterised by contested rent payments, property maintenance issues, and legal challenges. Carrie's public statements often frame landlords as unreasonable or neglectful, while landlords have taken formal steps to regain possession of properties. The case highlights the difficulties faced by Carrie-Anne Ridsdale in securing stable premises and the contentious nature of her landlord relationships. The discrepancies between her claims and documented landlord actions undermine the credibility of her assertions regarding tenancy security and eviction status.