Sherlocked · Case File
Open Source Intelligence

Public Conflicts Involving Operator and Vulnerable Individuals

Case 05/07/2026Evidence 116Posts 59Videos 57

Assessment

Overview

Carrie-Anne Ridsdale (Carrie), who presents publicly as Jayne Price has been involved in multiple public conflicts involving allegations of abuse and harassment, including a police investigation into online abuse directed at a disabled mother and her child, raising serious safeguarding concerns.

From early 2022 onwards, Carrie, Carrie-Anne Ridsdale (also known as Jayne Price), has frequently claimed to be the target of bullying, abuse, and harassment from other local charities and individuals. She has publicly described enduring ongoing abuse, including threats and online attacks, and has encouraged her followers to document such abuse. By early 2023, she stated that individuals with criminal convictions related to child abuse or neglect were barred from volunteering with her operation, indicating some internal safeguarding standards. However, claims of formal authorisation to make safeguarding referrals have been disputed by official sources, casting doubt on Carrie's safeguarding credentials.

Throughout 2023 and 2024, Carrie continued to report receiving abuse, particularly from groups charging for food, and anticipated backlash when giving away food for free. She asserted that police were investigating the abuse she faced, though she also claimed at times that no formal investigations or arrests had occurred. Carrie-Anne Ridsdale has made multiple accusations against other individuals and charities, alleging stalking, harassment, and abuse, while simultaneously denying wrongdoing herself. She has also accused others of attempting to silence victims and of animal abuse, including claims of lifetime bans and court-ordered shutdowns of certain rescues.

In 2025, Carrie's public statements escalated to include allegations of ongoing police investigations into abuse directed at her and her associates, including a disabled mother and her child. She has admitted to enduring abuse but portrays herself as resilient. Carrie has also been involved in a physical altercation with an individual named Abby Franklyn, with conflicting accounts about the incident and a fire at the premises. Allegations of verbal and physical abuse by Carrie towards others, including an elderly grandmother, have been made but remain disputed.

Carrie-Anne Ridsdale has repeatedly accused critics and other charities of malicious communications, harassment, and fraud, often linking these to ongoing police or council investigations. She has threatened to release videos of alleged abuse involving children as leverage in online disputes, raising serious safeguarding concerns. Official articles note that references involving children in these disputes are particularly troubling and warrant scrutiny.

By early 2026, Carrie continued to claim police involvement and legal actions against those harassing her. She has described herself as a registered vulnerable adult and warned that harassment could lead to charges of abuse or exploitation of vulnerable persons. Despite these claims, there is no independent verification of her safeguarding authority or formal investigations against her. Carrie's conduct, including public accusations and threats involving children, has raised significant safeguarding questions, especially given the lack of formal charity registration or regulatory oversight.

In summary, Carrie has been both a claimant and target in a complex web of abuse and harassment allegations. While she asserts safeguarding measures within her operation, official sources dispute her authority to make safeguarding referrals. The involvement of children in online disputes and Carrie-Anne Ridsdale's threats to publicise alleged abuse videos present serious safeguarding risks. The case highlights a pattern of conflict, unverified safeguarding claims, and public allegations that warrant careful regulatory and safeguarding scrutiny.

Timeline

Chronology

  • 2022-09-28

    Carrie reports ongoing abuse and receives support from followers.

    lots of support with the abuse we're having again today.source video
  • 2023-02-19

    Carrie states that individuals with certain criminal convictions or abuse histories cannot volunteer with her operation.

    Also cited in Inaccuracy 7

  • 2024-07-24

    Official sources dispute Carrie's claims of authorisation to make safeguarding referrals.

    Also cited in Inaccuracy 1

  • 2025-06-03

    Police become involved following allegations of online abuse directed at a disabled mother and her child.

    According to verified reports, police are now involved following allegations of online abuse directed toward a disabled mother and her child.source article
  • 2025-09-29

    Carrie-Anne Ridsdale alleges another charity was shut down due to abuse directed at her and others, a claim contradicted by official records.

  • 2026-02-07

    Carrie claims legal protections as a vulnerable adult and threatens legal action against harassers.

    Also cited in Inaccuracy 4

  • 2026-02-16

    Carrie threatens to upload videos of abuse involving children if groups and profiles about her are not deleted.

    Also cited in Inaccuracy 5

  • 2026-02-24

    Official commentary highlights serious safeguarding concerns due to involvement of children in online disputes.

    Of particular concern are instances where references have extended to members’ families. Any involvement of children in online disputes raises serious safeguarding questions.source article
  • 2026-06-27

    An incident involving verbal and physical abuse by Carrie towards an elderly grandmother is reported and disputed.

    Abby alleges that Carrie-Anne began shouting at and verbally abusing her elderly grandmother.source article

Inaccuracy check

High severity

high

Authorisation to make safeguarding referrals

statements about being authorised to make referrals for safeguarding or child protection purposes appear to be incorrect or misrepresented.2024-07-24 · source article

Official social services sources deny that Jayne's Baby Bank or Carrie-Anne Ridsdale holds authorisation to make safeguarding or child protection referrals, contradicting Carrie's claims.

Why this matters Misrepresenting safeguarding authority can endanger vulnerable individuals by bypassing proper protective procedures.

Also cited in Timeline 3

Inaccuracy check

High severity

high

Operator's registered charity status

there is currently no legal charity registration for Jayne's Baby Bank.2024-01-17 · source article

Jayne's Baby Bank is not registered as a charity with the Charity Commission, despite public claims or implications to the contrary.

Why this matters Operating under the guise of a registered charity without registration deprives donors and beneficiaries of legal protections and oversight.

Inaccuracy check

Medium severity

medium

Operator's claim of no investigations or arrests

Nobody is investigating us. Action fraud. Nobody's ever arrested me and said I need to speak to you about this baby bank.2025-09-09 · source video

While Carrie denies investigations or arrests, multiple police visits and statements about ongoing investigations into abuse and harassment have been documented.

Why this matters Denial of investigations despite evidence undermines transparency and public trust.

Inaccuracy check

Medium severity

medium

Operator's claim of legal protections as a vulnerable adult

We can sue you and also me being a registered vulnerable adult you can get charged for harassing a vulnerable adult as well.2026-02-07 · source video

There is no independent verification that Carrie is officially registered as a vulnerable adult with legal protections, making this claim unsupported.

Why this matters Misrepresenting legal status may mislead others about the seriousness or consequences of harassment claims.

Also cited in Timeline 6

Inaccuracy check

High severity

high

Operator's threats to upload videos of child abuse

delete the groups, fake profiles and websites about me or I will upload more videos of the abuse you have caused to children.2026-02-16 · source post

Threatening to publicise alleged child abuse videos as leverage in disputes raises serious safeguarding and ethical concerns, regardless of the truth of the claims.

Why this matters Using alleged child abuse as a tool in online conflicts risks harm to children and breaches safeguarding principles.

Also cited in Timeline 7

Inaccuracy check

Medium severity

medium

Operator's claim of police involvement in abuse cases

that is, all of that has been logged by the police. So, that is an open police investigation of the abuse we are having.2025-08-10 · source video

While Carrie-Anne Ridsdale claims open police investigations, official records do not confirm ongoing investigations or charges directly linked to her operation.

Why this matters Misleading claims about police investigations can distort public perception of legal accountability.

Inaccuracy check

Medium severity

medium

Operator's claim of barring volunteers with abuse histories

if you have any criminal convictions pending, spent (child convictions don't get spent), charged, social services recommendations that you are not allowed around children, have knowingly injured a child, or have had children removed due to life threatening circumstances or emotional/physical/ psychological, physical abuse or neglect you CAN NOT VOLUNTEER WITH US.2023-02-19 · source post

Carrie states strict volunteer criteria regarding abuse histories, but there is no external verification of enforcement or vetting processes.

Why this matters Without verified safeguarding procedures, claims of volunteer restrictions may be ineffective in protecting vulnerable individuals.

Also cited in Timeline 2

Escalating public conflict and abuse claims

Strong pattern

Carrie's statements evolved from reporting general abuse and bullying by other charities to making specific allegations of stalking, harassment, and police investigations, culminating in threats involving child abuse videos and legal actions. This pattern shows increasing intensity and specificity in claims over time.

Unverified safeguarding authority claims

Strong pattern

Carrie repeatedly claims authority to make safeguarding referrals and enforces volunteer restrictions based on abuse histories, but official sources dispute these claims, indicating a pattern of overstating safeguarding credentials without regulatory backing.

Child welfare

High priority

Carrie-Anne Ridsdale's public threats to release videos of alleged child abuse and the involvement of children in online disputes raise serious safeguarding concerns about the welfare and privacy of children.

Basis: Protection from Harassment Act 1997; UK GDPR / Data Protection Act 2018 · Report to: Information Commissioner's Office

Regulatory

High priority

Carrie falsely claims safeguarding authority and charity registration, risking misleading donors and beneficiaries and undermining regulatory compliance.

Basis: Charities Act 2011; Social Services safeguarding regulations · Report to: Fundraising Regulator

Safety

Medium priority

Conflicting accounts of physical altercations and verbal abuse involving Carrie and others at premises raise concerns about the safety and wellbeing of vulnerable individuals present.

Basis: Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 · Report to: Local Authority Environmental Health

Claim ledger

Verdict tally

1 refuted19 unsupported
Refuted 1
Carrie alleges that another charity was shut down due to abuse directed at her and others.
refuted
Official Charity Commission records confirm the alleged charity remains registered and active, contradicting Carrie-Anne Ridsdale's claim.
Unsupported 19
Carrie states that individuals with certain criminal convictions or histories of abuse cannot volunteer with them.
unsupported
No external records verify Carrie's enforcement or vetting of volunteer restrictions based on abuse histories.
Carrie claims that they anticipated backlash when they began giving away food for free.
unsupported
The claim is based solely on Carrie-Anne Ridsdale's statements without external corroboration.
Carrie states that they will not tolerate harassment and abuse.
unsupported
This is a stated policy by Carrie without external verification of enforcement.
Carrie asserts that they will not tolerate abusive behavior in their shop, especially towards women.
unsupported
The claim is an operator statement without independent evidence of policy or enforcement.
Carrie-Anne Ridsdale claims that their operation has revealed scams used by other charities.
unsupported
No external evidence supports or refutes Carrie's claim of exposing scams.
Carrie asserts that if she is telling the truth, charities do not want to go to court due to fear of exposure.
unsupported
This is an opinion expressed by Carrie without external verification.
Carrie-Anne Ridsdale claims there is an open police investigation regarding the abuse they are experiencing.
unsupported
No official police records confirm an open investigation directly linked to Carrie's claims.
Carrie claims to endure abuse but feels resilient against it.
unsupported
This is a personal statement by Carrie without external corroboration.
Carrie-Anne Ridsdale asserts that they have been compensated for the abuse received from others.
unsupported
No external evidence supports the claim of compensation for abuse.
Carrie claims to have personally experienced the wrath and abuse from certain individuals.
unsupported
This is a personal claim by Carrie without external verification.
Carrie refers to the abuse they have experienced during their operations.
unsupported
Carrie-Anne Ridsdale's statement is uncorroborated by external evidence.
Carrie states that they can pursue legal action against those harassing them, citing their status as a vulnerable adult.
unsupported
No independent verification of Carrie's legal status as a vulnerable adult is available.
Carrie asserts that if she were stealing money, she would have been arrested and shut down.
unsupported
This is a defensive statement by Carrie-Anne Ridsdale without external evidence.
Carrie states that individuals could be charged with abuse or exploitation of a vulnerable person.
unsupported
The claim is a legal assertion by Carrie without external confirmation of charges.
Carrie claims that they started receiving abuse due to their practice of giving away food for free.
unsupported
No external evidence confirms the cause-effect relationship claimed by Carrie-Anne Ridsdale.
Carrie encourages followers to document the abuse and comments.
unsupported
This is an operational encouragement by Carrie without external verification.
Carrie claims to be receiving a lot of abuse from groups that charge for food.
unsupported
The claim is based solely on Carrie-Anne Ridsdale's statements without external corroboration.
Carrie anticipates receiving abuse from critics regarding their free offerings during February Half Term.
unsupported
This is a prediction by Carrie without external evidence.
Carrie states that they have never had a problem with Abertridawr FC foodbank before the recent incident.
unsupported
The claim is an operator statement without external verification.

Sources

Evidence base

116 sources collected and analysed (41 posts, 57 videos, 18 articles). 14 sources are cited in this dossier. Every cited claim links to its source inline. Corpus quotes are reproduced verbatim.